Photoshoot: Christina Hendricks for Capitol File Magazine

What do you get when you take Christina Hendricks and style her in some TO. DIE. FOR. Oscar de la Renta, D&G, Holly Fulton and Errickson Beamon?

Perfection.

I want every single item she is wearing.

LEFT: Dress, Oscar de la Renta ($1,690). Saks Fifth Avenue; saks.com. Necklace, Dolce & Gabbana (price on request). Visit dolcegabbana.com. RIGHT: Dress, Dolce & Gabbana (price on request). Visit dolcegabbana.com. Necklace, Eddie Borgo ($225). Dresscode by Gita, 36 Village of Cross Keys, Baltimore, 410-323-9009. Ring, Alexis Bittar ($125). Visit alexisbittar.com. (caption from Capitol File Magazine)

Dress, Alaïa ($2,520). Select Barneys New York 
stores; barneys.com. Thin cuff ($228), wide cuff 
($288), Holly Fulton. Visit browns.co.uk.
(caption from Capitol File Magazine)

Dress, Ports 1961 ($550). Bloomingdale’s, The Shops
at Wisconsin Place, Chevy Chase, 301-841-4000. 
 Jacket, BCBG (price on request). Visit bcbg.com. 
 Earrings, Errickson Beamon ($478). Barneys Co-op,
3040 M St. NW, 202-350-5832
(caption from Capitol File Magazine)

Link to full article here.

On a side note - I know there has been talk about Christina's London Fog campaign and whether or not she was photoshopped in some of the images.  If you compare these two side by side, it certainly looks like her waist and hips were slimmed down for the official ad image:

I would also argue that she has been slimmed down in the photo below, especially when compared to the killer curves she's modeling in the GQ UK photo:

What do you think?  Photoshop or no? And if so - why do companies so often insist on minimizing curves, especially in a case like this when the woman in question is celebrated for them?

All images from Capitol File Magazine, London Fog, or GQ UK